Wow

Do not miss Josh Marshall’s catch on the fake Fox News story by Carl Cameron. Short story: the fair-and-balanced Fox News correspondent assigned to the Kerry campaign authored a “satirical” list of fake Kerry quotes straight out of the RNC handbook which was somehow accidentally posted to the Fox site as real.

I’m sure the Guys with Websites will be outraged by this latest example of a biased media outlet disseminating manufactured news.

Won’t they?

At any rate, let me be the first to call for Carl Cameron’s resignation. Such obvious personal bias certainly can’t be tolerated at a respected news organization like Fox.

Not dead

But dead tired. Been on the road for two days. Got to listen to a lot of right wing talk radio. On the way up, pre-debate, they all sounded optimistic and happy. On the way back home, post-debate, they sounded let down and uncertain. I have to admit, I’m surprised by the public response (though not unpleasantly so) — this is how Bush always looks to me. So he’s shifty-eyed, smirks inappropriately, doesn’t seem capable of maintaining a coherent train of thought for a full ninety seconds, seems generally befuddled and irritable? Well, it’s nice the media and the commentariat finally noticed, but it’s not exactly as if any of this is news. Point is, when I went back to the hotel last night I was too tired to watch much post-debate spin, so I had no real idea how this was going to play — I would have been unsurprised to find that Kerry had been declared the loser, or that the whole thing had been declared a draw. I just can’t tell anymore. The gulf between what I observe when watching Bush and what the media report has just grown too wide. But he did look pretty terrible to me (and to the audience of derisive young students with whom I watched the debate). He looked like someone who’s spent so much time talking to yes men and sycophantic reporters and audiences who sign loyalty oaths that he’s forgotten what it’s like to have someone actually challenge him to his face when he conflates Saddam and Osama.

Anyway, I haven’t had much of a chance to look through the papers or the blogs, but I’m sure I’m not saying anything new here. One great moment on talk radio today: a caller on Limbaugh’s show postulated that Bush’s poor performance was due to the fact that he, unlike John Kerry, is used to talking to audiences which respond with applause and laughter, and since the debate audience had been instructed to stay quiet, it threw him off balance. Apparently the dittoheads believe Kerry goes and speaks at campaign rallies and is greeted with stony silence, and was therefore in his element last night. Oh, and one talking point to watch out for — both Limbaugh and Hannity had callers who were obviously reading from some RNC script — I’m too damn tired right now but I’ll bet if you dug through the various RNC websites you’d find it somewhere — claiming that they were Guardsmen and they were highly offended that Kerry would say there was a “back door draft,” because they were volunteers and they knew they could be called up at any time so for John Kerry to suggest that indefinitely extended deployments and stop-loss programs constituted a back door draft was a slap in their face. Blah blah blah.

Canandaigua

The presidential debate people forgot to check with me before scheduling Thursday’s big event — that’s the night I’m taking the dog and pony show to FLCC — but fortunately my talk will be over before the debate begins, and the room will even be set up so that anyone who wants to can stay and watch the sparring match afterwards. Could be fun.

How many times…

…have we heard that no one could have possibly foreseen the mess in Iraq?

Well, whaddya know:

The same intelligence unit that produced a gloomy report in July about the prospect of growing instability in Iraq warned the Bush administration about the potential costly consequences of an American-led invasion two months before the war began, government officials said Monday.

The estimate came in two classified reports prepared for President Bush in January 2003 by the National Intelligence Council, an independent group that advises the director of central intelligence. The assessments predicted that an American-led invasion of Iraq would increase support for political Islam and would result in a deeply divided Iraqi society prone to violent internal conflict.

One of the reports also warned of a possible insurgency against the new Iraqi government or American-led forces, saying that rogue elements from Saddam Hussein’s government could work with existing terrorist groups or act independently to wage guerrilla warfare, the officials said. The assessments also said a war would increase sympathy across the Islamic world for some terrorist objectives, at least in the short run, the officials said.

All right, so maybe someone could have seen it coming. And in fact did.

But hey, at least they’ve got schools now, right?

Indeed they do. And according to NBC news tonight, the schools which have been rehabilitated at great expense to the American taxpayer are mostly being run by — yes, you guessed it — hardline Islamic fundamentalists.

“Democracy, Whiskey, Sexy,” my ass.