Obligatory Brooks post

So. Let’s take a quick look and see what David Brooks is writing about this morning. Why, it’s a witty look at inside-the-Beltway dinner party know-it-alls! He describes the behavior of these insufferable boors:

He begins his dinner party performance with a combination of impressive name-dropping and crushing banality: “I was talking to Karl the other day – Karl Rove – and he mentioned that winning the most electoral votes is the key to winning the election. And when I bumped into Tim – Tim Russert – at Colin and Alma’s place, he agreed.”

Boy, don’t you just hate that? When you’re at a fabulous dinner party and some tedious name-dropper starts recounting his conversations with Karl and Tim? Talk about a universal, shared experience to which we can all relate! Hoo, boy!

Or maybe not.

Sarcasm aside, the column veers into such apparently unselfconscious self-parody, you really have to wonder if somebody hacked the Times’ computer system before the paper went to press. Consider the following:

Now dominating the table, the pundit should indulge in the sort of storytelling beloved by swing-state-travel braggarts. He should speak in counties, about his trips through Cuyahoga, Macomb, Muscatine and Broward. If somebody mentions she has an aunt living in Ridgeville just south of Dayton, he should fondly recall the exceptional Waffle House there.

Donning the false modesty worn by Those Who Talk to Voters, he should describe how he humbly listens to the volk, while making it clear that only someone as brilliant as himself could discern national trends from 13 conversations.

Now, remember, this is David Brooks writing this stuff. David Brooks is denouncing pundits who make quick forays into the hinterlands in order to draw facile conclusions about Real Americans. David Brooks, who famously took a journey to Franklin County, PA, in order to compare and contrast the many differences between red states and blue states — and just as famously got it all wrong, as writer Sasha Issenberg discovered:

As I made my journey, it became increasingly hard to believe that Brooks ever left his home. “On my journeys to Franklin County, I set a goal: I was going to spend $20 on a restaurant meal. But although I ordered the most expensive thing on the menu — steak au jus, ‘slippery beef pot pie,’ or whatever — I always failed. I began asking people to direct me to the most-expensive places in town. They would send me to Red Lobster or Applebee’s,” he wrote. “I’d scan the menu and realize that I’d been beaten once again. I went through great vats of chipped beef and ‘seafood delight’ trying to drop $20. I waded through enough surf-and-turfs and enough creamed corn to last a lifetime. I could not do it.”

Taking Brooks’s cue, I lunched at the Chambersburg Red Lobster and quickly realized that he could not have waded through much surf-and-turf at all. The “Steak and Lobster” combination with grilled center-cut New York strip is the most expensive thing on the menu. It costs $28.75. “Most of our checks are over $20,” said Becka, my waitress. “There are a lot of ways to spend over $20.”

The easiest way to spend over $20 on a meal in Franklin County is to visit the Mercersburg Inn, which boasts “turn-of-the-century elegance.” I had a $50 prix-fixe dinner, with an entrée of veal medallions, served with a lump-crab and artichoke tower, wild-rice pilaf and a sage-caper-cream sauce. Afterward, I asked the inn’s proprietors, Walt and Sandy Filkowski, if they had seen Brooks’s article. They laughed. After it was published in the Atlantic, the nearby Mercersburg Academy boarding school invited Brooks as part of its speaker series. He spent the night at the inn. “For breakfast I made a goat-cheese-and-sun-dried-tomato tart,” Sandy said. “He said he just wanted scrambled eggs.”

I’ll bet David Brooks is familiar with the sort of crushingly banal pundit he describes. Very, very familiar.

Health care

I haven’t done much on it lately, but longtime readers of my strip will remember that the American health insurance system, and the inevitable necessity of a single-payer system, have been ongoing themes of mine for many years. It’s an obsession borne of personal experience — I haven’t had a “real” job since 1989 or so, and given the peculiar American linkage of health care with employment status, there have been long periods where finding health insurance was rough going.

These days, of course, businesses are starting to balk at the unreasonable costs of health insurance. The irony there is that — as I understand it — business fought labor to retain its status as the primary provider of health benefits some sixty or seventy years ago, in order to maintain greater control over the workforce. At any rate, the notion that the free market is the best system under which something as basic and necessary as health care can be provided is utter and demonstrable nonsense, even as George W. (“W” is for “Who the hell cares what happens to you?”) Bush continues to bring up the hoary old canard of “Washington bureaucrats” deciding what health care is right for you. Donald Bartlett and James Steele explain it all in today’s New York Times:

The explanation for this abysmal record is one that politicians decline to discuss. The market functions wonderfully when we want to sell more cereals, cosmetics, cars, computers or any other consumer product. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work in health care, where the goal should hardly be selling more heart bypass operations. Instead, the goal should be to prevent disease and illness. But the money is in the treatment – not prevention – so the market and good health care are at odds. Just how much at odds is seen in the current shortage of flu vaccine, as men and women in their 80’s and 90’s line up for hours at a time, hoping to get the shot they have been told they need, but may not receive because not nearly enough has been manufactured.

The reason for the shortage is this: Preventing a flu epidemic that could kill thousands is not nearly as profitable as making pills for something like erectile dysfunction, a decidedly non-fatal condition. Viagra, for example, brings in more than $1 billion a year for its maker, Pfizer. The profits to be made from selling flu vaccine are measly in comparison. If selling flu vaccine were as lucrative as marketing Viagra, sports broadcasts and the nightly news would be flooded with commercials warning that “winter is almost here; ask your doctor about flu vaccine” – and it would be available to anyone who wanted it. Instead, while many of those at risk of the flu go without the vaccine, primetime programs are sponsored by the makers of Viagra (“Get back to mischief”), Cialis (“Will you be ready?”) and Levitra (“Stay in the game”).

— snip —

What’s needed to control the costs and to provide basic health and hospitalization coverage for all Americans is an independent agency that would set national health care policy, collect medical fees, pay claims, reimburse doctors fairly and restrain runaway drug prices – a single-payer system that would eliminate the costly, inefficient bureaucracy generated by thousands of different plans. It’s not such a radical idea; a single-payer system already exists for Medicare.

Much more here. Go read.

Sound of one hand slapping forehead

Via Bob I see that, like the president himself, most Bush supporters live in a reality of their own creation:

Three out of 4 self-described supporters of President George W. Bush still believe that pre-war Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or active programs to produce them. According to a new survey published Thursday, the same number also believes that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein provided “substantial support” to al Qaeda.

But here is the truly astonishing part: as many or more Bush supporters hold those beliefs today than they did several months ago. In other words, more people believe the claims today — after the publication of a series of well-publicized official government reports that debunked both notions.