Purging the disloyal

The White House has ordered the new CIA director, Porter Goss, to purge the agency of officers believed to have been disloyal to President George W. Bush or of leaking damaging information to the media about the conduct of the Iraq war and the hunt for Osama bin Laden, according to knowledgeable sources.

Story, via Bob, who notes:

This is worse than it seems at first. “Disloyalty” here is the act of disagreeing. And since Bush and his cronies were wrong and/or lying about damn near everything in the run-up to the Iraq war, this means that everyone who actually did their job is in jeopardy of losing it. Which will leave only sycophants, incompetents, and those who’ve learned to play the game behind. And you can be pretty certain that Bush is gonna hear — and act on — whatever faith-based apocalyptic nonsense he wants in the next couple of years.

Halliburton

If you pay any attention to the yammerings of right wingers, and lord knows it’s increasingly difficult to avoid them these days, you’ve probably run across the reductionist caricature of the left/liberal who insistently screams “Halliburton” in lieu of an actual argument. It’s a nifty way of avoiding the actual argument — pretend that there is no argument, that your opponent is just incomprehensibly fixated on a single word, not unlike a toddler learning to speak.

Well, anyone who’s been paying attention — which is to say, anyone who actually reads newspapers — should know that there’s a bit more to the story.

(Halliburton’s) SEC filing Friday disclosed more trouble related to investigations by the SEC, Justice, a French magistrate and Nigerian officials into whether a consortium including Halliburton paid $180 million in bribes to Nigerian officials involving a gas plant from 1995 to 2002. Cheney ran the company from 1995 to 2000, and Halliburton bought the unit involved in the consortium in 1998.

That followed by little more than a week the last bad news about Halliburton: that the FBI expanded a probe into charges of contract irregularities by Halliburton in Iraq and Kuwait. Lawyers for a Pentagon official said the FBI requested an interview with her over her complaints that the Army gave a Halliburton unit preferential treatment when granting it a $7 billion contract to restore Iraq’s oil fields.

Halliburton also told shareholders that the Justice Department is examining whether operations in Iran by a subsidiary violated U.S. sanctions. The company received a grand jury subpoena in July and produced documents in September.

So among the spittle-flecked lefties muttering about Halliburton, we must include the FBI, the Justice Department, and the authors of Halliburton’s own SEC filing.

The Pentagon official mentioned above is, I assume, Bunnantine H. Greenhouse, who is — in addition to being a spittle-flecked leftie, obviously — the Army Corps of Engineers’ contracting director. There’s a profile of her today in the Times:

Things reached a climax as the Corps was thrust into the center of the Iraq war effort, given the task of distributing billions of dollars in reconstruction money. For the urgent repair of Iraqi oil fields, the Corps turned – too readily and too generously, Ms. Greenhouse charged in bruising internal debates last year – to the Houston-based Halliburton Company with one of the biggest single contracts of the war.

Now the Army Corps of Engineers is trying to demote Ms. Greenhouse, 60, or push her into retirement. To the surprise of no one who knows her, she is unbowed, charging in a much publicized letter of Oct. 21 that the Corps has shown a pattern of favoritism toward Halliburton that imperils “the integrity of the federal contracting program.”

— snip —

In March 2003, she saw no reason why the Corps should give the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root, without competition, a five-year, $7 billion contract to repair oil fields. If an emergency required a quick deal, it should be for only one year at most, she argued. (The contract was given for five years over her objection, but later, after a public outcry, was cut short and put to competition.)

In December, she said, she was outraged when Corps leaders went behind her back to issue a legal document approving the unusually high prices KBR had charged for fuel imports to Iraq – prices that the Pentagon’s own auditors called inflated by at least $61 million and that are now the subject of criminal inquiries.

This spring, she questioned why, after four years, an expiring Halliburton logistics contract in the Balkans had to be extended for an extra 11 months and $165 million on grounds that no other company could do the job in time.

“There is no legitimate explanation for what I witnessed,” she said last week of the succession of disputes. The Corps, she said, “was at the point of knowingly violating federal acquisition regulations in favor of Halliburton. It can’t get much worse than that.”

To the Halliburton defense that critics like Ms. Greenhouse did not understand the urgency of wartime, she replies, “Of course I care about the soldiers who are dying.”

“That $61 million could have gone for body armor for the soldiers,” she said in the interview.

So the next time someone acts as though anyone who mentions the word “Halliburton” is a tinfoil-hat conspiracy freak holed up in his basement to avoid the alien mind control rays — well, you can cross that person off your list of trustworthy commentators, because they are either lying or stupid, but in either case not to be taken seriously by rational people.

The spirit of inclusion

A reader in Austin shares some perspective on the voters we liberals must reach out to and strive to avoid offending at all costs:

Since I’ve been here I lived in a rural very small town and in the Dallas area before moving to Austin and I’ve met some very nice Democrats in Austin, I knew a fair number in Dallas, too. Austin is NOT as liberal as they’d like you to think. I still don’t let anyone know I’m a Democrats without finding out their political proclivities first.

Texas is unabashedly red and they make no pretense otherwise. As they say here what they intend to do with Democrats is “hunt them down with dogs and kill them” and they aren’t kidding. The cultural difference in the Bay Area and Texas is enough for them to be on different planets.

Ha, ha. Hunt Democrats down with dogs.

…sigh…yes, yes, of course, many of you have different experiences. As has been previously discussed, I don’t believe that everyone in a “red” state is a pickup-driving gun-toting Klan member. I don’t even buy the red/blue division — I think it’s more about shades of purple. But I also believe firmly that those who argue that there are no cultural regional differences are not being honest with themselves.

The secret landscape

I just finished Survival City, Tom Vanderbilt’s look at the architecture of the Cold War, abandoned and otherwise — from old missile silos to the interestate highway system. Chock full of small, fascinating details. For instance, I had no idea that that big, windowless, and rather ominous phone company building in lower Manhattan (a few blocks from an old studio of mine) was actually designed to withstand an atomic blast. And who knew that a few blocks from the Las Vegas strip, there is — or at least once was — an atomic-age underground home, spread “over 5,200 square feet and…surrounded by an Astroturf lawn, fake trees, and an ‘outdoor’ grill designed to send smoke and fumes up a fake tree trunk”? The quote is attributed to a 1996 Houston Chronicle article, so maybe the home is still there today. Does some reclusive Nevadan take shelter from the nonstop blare of the Las Vegas strip by literally going to ground? Is there still, somewhere beneath the fake New York and fake Paris and fake Egyptian pyramid, a fake suburban home complete with a fake outdoors, fake trees and, presumably fake sunlight? Or has the home been abandoned entirely, like the legendary “forgotten” subway stations of New York City?

…well, that didn’t take long — here’s the scoop.