THIS MODERN WORLD

I’ve got the last generation, pre-video (I think it was called the “photo” iPod, or something like that). When I leave it laying around for a few days unused, it goes into a deep energy-conservation mode, after which, maybe half the time, all my music disappears. The files haven’t been deleted–the instant I connect it to my computer, the music immediately reappears in the menus. It’s as if it forgets how to access the music files, but hooking it up to iTunes immediately jogs its memory. Which is fine, unless I happen to be three thousand miles away from my computer when it happens. Anybody ever experience this one? Am I just shit outta luck, or is there a patch?

Crooks and Liars has audio.

It’s pretty clear that this whole obsession with “defamation” is directly related to the embarassment he suffered when The Smoking Gun posted documents from that sexual harassment lawsuit. TSG is one of the few sites I’ve actually seen him mention by name, in the context of rants about “hate-filled left wing websites.” It’s an interesting definition of defamation — the reporting of true but inconvenient facts.

By the way, that blacklist of his is a bit of a disappointment so far. New York Daily News, St. Pete Times and MSNBC? I assume they’ve each run less than complimentary stories about O’Reilly–might be fun to dig them up and see what they did that stuck in his craw so badly.

They told us last January what they had in mind. So I guess this should really not come as any surprise:

As the American military pushes the largely Shiite Iraqi security services into a larger role in combating the insurgency, evidence has begun to mount suggesting that the Iraqi forces are carrying out executions in predominantly Sunni neighborhoods.

Hundreds of accounts of killings and abductions have emerged in recent weeks, most of them brought forward by Sunni civilians, who claim that their relatives have been taken away by Iraqi men in uniform without warrant or explanation.

Some Sunni men have been found dead in ditches and fields, with bullet holes in their temples, acid burns on their skin, and holes in their bodies apparently made by electric drills. Many have simply vanished.

Some of the young men have turned up alive in prison. In a secret bunker discovered earlier this month in an Interior Ministry building in Baghdad, American and Iraqi officials acknowledged that some of the mostly Sunni inmates appeared to have been tortured.

Bayan Jabr, the interior minister, and other government officials denied any government involvement, saying the killings were carried out by men driving stolen police cars and wearing police and army uniforms purchased at local markets. “Impossible! Impossible!” Mr. Jabr said. “That is totally wrong; it’s only rumors; it is nonsense.”

Many of the claims of killings and abductions have been substantiated by at least one human rights organization working here – which asked not to be identified because of safety concerns – and documented by Sunni leaders working in their communities.

American officials, who are overseeing the training of the Iraqi Army and the police, acknowledge that police officers and Iraqi soldiers, and the militias with which they are associated, may indeed be carrying out killings and abductions in Sunni communities, without direct American knowledge.

But they also say it is difficult, in an already murky guerrilla war, to determine exactly who is responsible. The American officials insisted on anonymity because they were working closely with the Iraqi government and did not want to criticize it publicly.

The widespread conviction among Sunnis that the Shiite-led government is bent on waging a campaign of terror against them is sending waves of fear through the community, just as Iraqi and American officials are trying to coax the Sunnis to take part in nationwide elections on Dec. 15.

Sunnis believe that the security forces are carrying out sectarian reprisals, in part to combat the insurgency, but also in revenge for years of repression at the hands of Saddam Hussein’s government.

Ayad Allawi, a prominent Iraqi politician who is close to the Sunni community, charged in an interview published Sunday in The London Observer that the Iraqi government – and the Ministry of Interior in particular – was condoning torture and running death squads.

All from the op-ed page. First, this bit from David Brooks’ oddly myopic homage-to-warriors on Sunday:

Every time you delve into the situation in Iraq, you come away with the phrase “not enough troops” ringing in your head, and I hope someday we will find out how this travesty came about.

Yes, it’s truly a mystery how this travesty came about. Mercy me, I can’t for the life of me figure it out. It’s sure a puzzler, no question about it.

Second, this peculiar assertion from John Tierney (who is required by the Official Cranky Libertarian Rulebook to make counterintuitive arguments in support of Wal Mart):

The average income of shoppers at Wal Mart is $35,000, compared with $50,000 at Target and $74,000 at Costco. Costco is touted as the virtuous alternative to Wal Mart because it pays better wages, but it needs to because it requires higher-skilled workers to sell higher-end products to its more affluent customers.

All I can figure here is that Tierney has never set foot in either Wal Mart or Costco, because the merchandise in each is essentially the same. All we’re really talking about is the difference between cheap DVD players and slightly less cheap DVD players. It’s not as if the aisles of Costco are filled with society ladies in furs and pearls, demanding a highly refined workforce to cater to their discriminating needs.

Costco shoppers may well have a higher average income, but the reason is simple–warehouse stores sell in bulk. In order to save money over the long run, you have to spend significantly more upfront. And while I think it is commendable that Costco pays its workers a decent living wage, it’s not because of the customer service. Which is not a slam on Costco workers–the whole point of a warehouse store is that it’s mostly a do-it-yourself experience. Which Tierney would know if he’d ever been inside one.

Lastly, this shiny piece of nonsense from John J. Miller’s guest piece on the end of the Olin Foundation (the only one of the three not hidden behind the Select firewall):

So, is it possible to create a liberal version of the John M. Olin Foundation? I have my doubts. The success of any idea certainly depends to some extent on whether it can muster financial support, and it may also benefit from effective marketing. But in the end, not all ideas are equal. Some are simply better than others…(C)onservative ideas took flight not because wealthy philanthropists were suddenly willing to finance them, but because they identified actual problems and offered sensible solutions.

Yes, of course. What’s that famous phrase? Something about an idea repeated loudly and long enough becoming true–but only if it’s a really good idea to begin with. Because lord knows, those are the only kinds of ideas that our species ever embraces.

UPDATE: Tbogg responds to Tierney’s thesis that Wal Mart is a force for good in society.

For all of you conservatives who love to praise the “free market”, let me call bullshit on this enduring lie that the President frequently cites to sell his immigration plan. From yesterday’s speech :

As we enforce our immigration laws, comprehensive immigration reform also requires us to improve those laws by creating a new temporary worker program. This program would create a legal way to match willing foreign workers with willing American employers to fill jobs that Americans will not do. Workers would be able to register for legal status for a fixed period of time, and then be required to go home. This program would help meet the demands of a growing economy, and it would allow honest workers to provide for their families while respecting the law.

The “jobs Americans won’t do” lie was also recently advanced in the Washington Post by a spokesman for the Labor Department and a “panicking” farmer (via Kevin Drum) :

“There are just some jobs people don’t want to do,” Nassif said. “It’s the most developed nation in the world using a foreign workforce, and people need to recognize that. We need to make them legal.”

Jack Vessey said he listed openings for 300 laborers at the state office of employment last week to prepare the lettuce fields for harvest. “We got one person,” he said. “He showed up and said, ‘I’m not going to do that.'”

The key to unraveling this bullshit is that the anonymous laborer quoted above likely ended his gripe with “unless you pay me more”. The President wants you to think this is because American workers are shiftless elitists, but it’s the employers and their shills who are the assholes here.

What people like the George W. Bush don’t understand is that capitalism is not a one-way street. When the demand for workers is high and the supply of laborers is low, the rational solution would be for employers to raise wages, increase benefits, or both to ensure that supply catches up to demand. But that would mean actually spending more money, and we can’t have that.

Instead, employers have found a way to get around their obligations by employing “undocumented” workers (and thus creating a demand for illegal labor). Why are these men and women willing to do the same job that Americans are unwilling to do for less money? Well, they’re here illegally, for one. They probably don’t speak English well and have little familiarity with existing labor laws. They’re doing a job that’s unskilled while under the constant threat of deportation. Sounds like the new face of indentured servitude to me, but the President and his allies are trying to figure out ways to make it acceptable.

But here’s the key to all of these proposals : These illegal workers aren’t being offered citizenship, but membership in a “guest worker program”. Bush and co. don’t give a damn about the working class in this country, they just want to make sure that the crooks aren’t penalized for breaking our labor laws. The solutions bandied about would create a pseudo-citizenship which will protect employers but do little to lift immigrant workers from the bottom rung on the economic ladder. When residence is closely tied to employment, the threat of deportation doesn’t go away, it just gets hidden a little better.

Which makes this whole debate even more galling. Immigrants are being exploited, American workers are getting screwed, and the whole debate is happenening as if these two groups of victims are on opposite sides. If you want to stop illegal immigration, you don’t need to build a fence. The supply of illegal labor will go away once the demand for it ceases. We don’t need new plans, we need to rigorously enforce the laws already on the books. If that means that employers are going to have to pay more to the people doing the jobs that “Americans won’t do” and pass those costs on to the consumer, then it’s hardly our place to question the wisdom of the invisible hand, right?

Also, it should be stressed again that George Bush and his allies should be ashamed of themselves for slandering us with their anti-worker rhetoric. Aren’t you paying attention, America? The President of the United States just called you an indolent snob. He thinks you’re too lazy to do an honest day’s work and too effete to do work that will get your hands dirty. Doesn’t that piss you off? It should.