In commemoration of the moment …

… a new design in the shop, available on the usual assortment of items — the perfect gift and/or apparel for your inauguration celebration! (Limited time only, I’ll probably take this one down sometime after Jan. 20.)

I’ve also put together a 2009 calendar featuring some of my full-page cartoons from the New Yorker, the American Prospect, and the Village Voice, mostly from 1999-2003 (though my more recent Bill O’Reilly piece for the Voice is included). The unifying theme: George Bush is not mentioned, not one damn time.

Ah, New Haven

I live in a dense urban neighborhood, in which the majority of houses are built close together, with few driveways. So most people park on the street, and like urban residents anywhere, you have to keep an eye on the street cleaning rules — which, the permanent signs clearly state, are suspended for the winter beginning Nov. 1.

So here’s what this lovely cash-strapped city of mine does: they come by late in the day, after dark, after most people are already home for the evening, and put up a few temporary paper signs up and down the street, announcing with no warning that — surprise! — tomorrow’s a street cleaning day. And that’s considered sufficient notice, and if you don’t see the signs in time, you’re shit out of luck. I did happen to go out last night, so I didn’t get towed, but a lot of other people around here weren’t so lucky, and the city of New Haven probably just made an easy thousand bucks for itself, on my street alone. It may be legal to give people less than a day’s notice and then tow their cars, but morally, it’s barely one step above a mafia protection racket. Especially when the street cleaning “emergency” is not a massive snowstorm or something — just a normal accumulation of fall leaves.

(Some editing for clarity on this.)

Yeesh

Imagine behaving like this.

Imagine being proud of it.

Sometimes I think the most important thing the internets have done is to expose the craziness simmering just below the surface in most people (excluding thee and me, of course). Then again, it just confirms what I have long suspected.

Saving Detroit

When it comes to bailing out the auto industry, count me in the “let them starve” camp. The auto industry has been outsourcing American jobs for 25 years now with little regard for the devastated communities they’ve left in their wake (seriously, re-watch Roger & Me sometime). The big three have also used their lobbying might to oppose every environmental regulation in their sights. And on top of all of that, their cars suck. Bailing out the auto companies whose single-minded devotion to SUV’s made them blind to the hybrid revolution is like bailing out a record company that hasn’t had a hit since “The Macarena”. Screw them.

That said, I am sensitive to the fact that letting the big three go out of business would be a pretty serious blow to our already fragile economy. But if the solution to what ails automakers is an infusion of cash, wouldn’t it be better to get banks involved? If we’ve already set aside $700 billion to help bailout banks in the hopes that it will free up lending, wouldn’t it be a better idea to just have Congress mandate that banks participating in the bailout must offer debtor-in-possession loans to the big three. That way, if an auto manufacturer fails, they need to file for Chapter 11 like any other company whose poor business decisions lead to their downfall AND the banks free up some cash and start lending again.

Obviously this is probably an oversimplification, but there’s gotta be a better way of saving the auto industry than just writing another giant check.

Down memory lane

Last March:

U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman blasted the Democratic Party Sunday as protectionist, isolationist and hyperpartisan.

Speaking on ABC’s “This Week,” Lieberman, I-Conn., said it is not the same party that made him its vice presidential candidate in 2000.

“It’s not the Bill Clinton-Al Gore party, which was strong internationalists, strong on defense, pro-trade, pro-reform in our domestic government,” he said. “It’s been effectively taken over by a small group on the left of the party that is protectionist, isolationist and very, very hyperpartisan. So it pains me.”

Lieberman, who won re-election to the Senate as an independent after losing the 2006 Connecticut Democratic primary anti-war candidate Ned Lamont, still caucuses with Democrats.

But he has endorsed Republican John McCain’s presidential bid, and said Sunday that among the three presidential candidates, McCain comes closest to reflecting the legacy of John F. Kennedy.

(Ran across this because I’m starting to gather material for my Year in Review cartoons. Lord knows this last year has been chock full of strange little moments, but I’m very open to reader input — if you’ve got any suggestions for items I might want to include, please feel free to send them to tomtomorrow (atsymbol) ix (dot) netcom (d0t) com.)